On Mar 31, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Charles Martin wrote: >> From: Steven Rogers <srogers1 at austin.rr.com> >> >> On Mar 30, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Charles Martin wrote: >> >>> As a point of fact, one cannot dispute that Microsoft is a monopoly >>> (an abusive monopoly, actually), since it has been judged so by both >>> the US Circuit Court and the European Union. That *makes* it a fact, >>> in addition to being bloody obvious. >> >> Kind of like when states pass laws that declare Pi = 3.0 > > You have, of course, documentation of which state has passed such a > law ... No, because its not my purpose to attack any particular state, but rather to show the absurdity of your approach to the issue. As far as the rest - I expect the patience of the list is worn out. I'm not "confused" about whether the courts are part of government or whether its illegal to be a monopoly vs. exercise monopoly powers. We simply don't agree about fundamentals. SR