On Jan 6, 2005, at 11:56 PM, Chris Walker wrote: > On 6/1/05 Charles Martin wrote: > >> Yes, but it's usually very minor stuff if you repaired permissions >> *before* the install as well. A recent example resulted in only one >> permission altered: the iso9660 kernel extension (which says "we are >> using special permissions here"). > > > That's interesting. If I repair permissions using Onyx and immediately > afterwards repair them again with Disk Utility I get the msg that the > iso9660 permissions are incorrect and Disk Utility fixes them. > Obviously > Onyx (and possibly also Cocktail and some of the other third party > stuff) > does not use these special permissions. > > Why should there be these special permissions and why doesn't Onyx pick > this up? Possibly one for the developer. This has nothing to do with Onyx vs Disk Utility. The message about iso9660 is a known bug in Disk Utility and can be safely ignored. There is either release notes or a knowledge base article on this if you want to look for it. Phil