On 11/19/06 2:45 PM, "Steven Rogers" <srogers1 at austin.rr.com> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Mark Gibson wrote: > >> Can you perhaps send as plain text instead of HTML? That should >> reduce the message size? > > He probably could, but it seems like it would be a lot easier if > posters (who are supposed to be Newbies, after all) don't have to > worry about all that stuff to get a message through in a timely > manner. If you're a first-time poster, then having your message held > for moderation is to be expected - even if its excruciating to wait > while your system is on fire. But message size seems like a pretty > weak indicator of a legitimate vs. non-legitimate message. > > SR As is often the case, there is more going on here than meets the eye. Brian's message did not seem to be that long to me, so I dumped it into a word processor and checked. It is only 1893 characters long! But... It's header is 3199 characters, for a total of 5092. This is not atypical; I looked at the size of several other messages, and all the headers are huge. Furthermore, a lot of it is administrivia added on by themacintoshguy's server. This is clearly a case for our listmom; a practical message limit of 1.9K is ridiculous.