We, being the cheapskates we are, intend to run OS X Client as a server OS. We don't see the point in spend loads of dosh on a "server" OS when you don't get any additional benefit other than a lighter checkbook. If Apple put a user limit in Mac OS X without telling us, I would consider that an Extremely Bad Move (R) ... >On 21 Feb, 2004, at 16:02, luke wrote: >>On Friday, February 20, 2004, at 11:59 AM, Mike Jezierski wrote: >> >>>We have an OS X 10.3.2 box (DP 450 G4) and it has 99 users >>>accounts set up on it. I am not aware of any hard limit on OS X on >>>number of users. >>> >>>When we click + to add a user, nothing happens. We removed a user, >>>and tried to add another, and still nothing happens. >> >>almost sounds like a licensing limit... >> >>eg: OS X client will only allow 99 users, but OS X server allows unlimited? > >That is probably the "limit" of a 2 character field in the GUI. ... >i.e. a "feature." >(Some would call it a "bug.") > >Remember, OS X Client, is really intended as a single user system, >so "nobody" would ever need more than a two digit field's worth of >users. ... any more than they would ever need more than 640K of >memory. :) > >OS X Server has a license limit of 10 users or "unlimited." However, >I don't believe that is based on the number of userids existing, >but rather on the number of logins -- Don't know, never worked with >the license limited version. -- Michael Jezierski - mike at galesburg dot net Internet Administrator & Engineer TriLutions Computer & Internet Center Galesburg, IL 61401 USA Office: +1.3093427177 x 212 Mobile: +1.3092217916