[X-Unix] Backdoor method to add users
luke
etyrnal at ameritech.net
Mon Feb 23 17:04:44 PST 2004
On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 04:22 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2004, at 4:02 pm, William H. Magill wrote:
>
> Both client & server versions of OS X are exactly the same under the
> hood - a much better analogy is that they are both the same make &
> type of car, except that OS X server has the higher-end "trim" &
> "options" for more demanding drivers.
i mostly agree here...
>
> If OS X server is a general-purpose, multi-user, time-sharing, Unix
> system, then so is OS X client - as I understand it the only
> difference between the two is a few GUI admin goodies. I do agree that
> is a reasonable expectation that most workstation- and domestic-users
> would have no need to add more than 99 users,
I am the ONLY user of TWO of my macs on my network...
i have SEVERAL users - but not human users...
a 'user' is not always a human being... i have several 'users' that
are merely different operating environments...
some are there merely because a particular service needs to have it's
own 'user'...
I seem to remember them pushing the idea that OS X client was 'rock
solid unix' under the hood... not a partial implementation...
Is the Kernel licensed under an open-source type agreement?
Which parts of OS X are 'open source' and which parts are based on
'free' (so to speak) Unix
or public BSD or whatever?
__ http://etyrnal.no-ip.com .__
____ _/ |_ ___.__. _______ ____ _____ | |
_/ __ \ \ __\ < | | \_ __ \ / \ \__ \ | |
\ ___/ | | \___ | | | \/ | | \ / __ \_ | |__
\___ > |__| / ____| |__| |___| / (____ / |____/
\/ \/ \/ \/
More information about the X-Unix
mailing list