"William H. Magill" <magill at mcgillsociety.org> wrote >On 23 Feb, 2004, at 09:01, Mike Jezierski wrote: > > > We, being the cheapskates we are, intend to run OS X Client as a >> server OS. We don't see the point in spend loads of dosh on a "server" >> OS when you don't get any additional benefit other than a lighter >> checkbook. If Apple put a user limit in Mac OS X without telling us, I >> would consider that an Extremely Bad Move (R) ... > >You are confused. ... Stop and think about what you are trying to do. amen...osx server is the only way to go...otherwise the lost time and trouble will soon cost more than shelling out for the software to begin with. don