On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:15 pm, Dan Frakes wrote: > ... If you're actually > using Mac OS X as a server, the Server version is well worth the extra > dough, as good admin tools are a huge part of a good server OS. I've already stated that I'm inclined to agree with this. (I can't talk about OS X sever from experience). > ...nor is it cheap to test and certify an OS... What certification..? I've had a good glance through <http://www.apple.com/server/> and <http://a208.g.akamai.net/7/208/51/419c85d2698237/www.apple.com/server/ pdfs/MacOSX_Server_TO_300195.pdf> and don't see any mention of them. iIf OS X had, for instance, ISO certification, wouldn't they be boasting about it in big letters at <http://www.apple.com/server/>..? > The "cost of production" for server-level administration tools is not > low... Oh, come on. We're talking about stuff like a Cocoa GUI for editing things like Apache.conf & Samba.conf. Whilst I'm sure they're not knocked up in 5 minutes, they're one of the substantial differences between OS X client and the $300 - $800 more expensive server edition. > If you really need a server OS, the price of Mac OS X Server is a huge > bargain. Ask your friendly neighborhood Windows network admin how much > he/she paid for a server OS with unlimited clients... I'm not sure that that's really the point. If the OP wants to be tight-fisted (and I respect a cautious approach to overheads in any business), OS X client is essentially the same under the hood as OS X server, and so he doesn't have to pay for these extra tools if he doesn't want them, however much time you & I might think they'll save him. Stroller.