Stroller <MacMonster at myrealbox.com> wrote: > I don't mind top-posting, but what bugs me is a posting in which top- > and bottom-posting are mixed in such a way as to make reading the > quoting nonsensical. I've edited the below quoting. > > How about all the bottom-posters agree to top-post when a top-poster > has previously replied to a thread, and all the top-posters agree to > bottom-post when the previous message was bottom-posted? [snip] Something needs to change. Christsakes... how is one supposed to follow such disjointed writing. Either bottom post on reply inline IMO, _please_ don't top post. Is it _that_ hard to move the insertion point??? > Panther's keyboard shortcuts preference pane has alleviated the problem > to some extent, but I still find it extremely difficult to remember > shortcuts whose only logic is dictated by the fact that they've been > used since mediaeval times. > > Stroller. There's one kb shortcut I always forget, but would use often if only there was a decent ready reference - what's the one that moves sequentially through every program's open windows one after the other (not within one program, but through all open program's windows)? Regards, Jamie Kahn Genet -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting aka TOFU (Top-post Over, Full quote Under) Q: What is the most annoying thing on mailing lists?