[X4U] 10.4 vs 10.3 with smb shared drives vs shared folders

[Stroller]

On 31 Jul 2006, at 07:07, Brett Conlon wrote:
> ...
> Anyone know why 10.3 cannot see an smb shared folder? I'm accessing it
> using: smb://111.222.333.44

Ummm... because 111.222.333.44 isn't a valid IP address?   :P

333 is not a valid byte.
;)

> Our IT dept SAN has a number of shared drives and a shared folder  
> that I
> need my designers to have access to. 10.4 users can see the folder but
> 10.3 users can't - only the shared drives.
>
> Actually the IT fellow just had me successfully connect with the  
> following
> method:  smb://111.222.333.44/FolderName

This is surely a Samba problem.

My Tiger system shows "version 3.0.10" when `smbd --version` is run  
at the command-line. I would suggest this be your first stop,  
although to be honest I'd imagine that getting this resolved might  
take quite a little bit of research.

Stroller.