[X4U] Re: Hijacking threads

[Muckerheide]

Because it is, by definition, ³wrong² when it doesn¹t conform to the
mechanism built into the tool that they are using, especially when the tool
then fails to work as intended, whether or not to their own detriment.

As Wendy said, if you change the subject, be aware that people who use
threads (who may be useful resources) won¹t see your message.

And, of course, there¹s nothing ³wrong² with deciding to do it your way
(i.e., ³wrong² :-), but info on why that might not work as well as it could
should be considered.

And there¹s nothing ³wrong² with explaining it by calling it ³wrong.² :-)

Regards, Jim
=========
  
on 1/21/07 1:54 PM, nk at netkat at comcast.net wrote:

> why does what some folks do have to be defined as "wrong?"
> why do those folks need to be straightened out?
> 
> nk
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Wendy S. Austin wrote:
> 
>>> >> On 21 Jan 2007, at 18:09, Linda wrote:
>>> >> (And... STILL no one has explained to the people whose behavior
>>> >> sparked the
>>> >> thread, WHY what they are doing is considered wrong by some folks...)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> X4U mailing list
> X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u
> 
> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff:
>          http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/x4u/attachments/20070121/a035dd7c/attachment.html