On Jul 19, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Roy v.d. Westhuizen wrote: > Can anyone inform me if it is prudent to install Lion or safer to > give it a miss? If you have a Mac that's a few years old, chances are good that you have some legacy software with PowerPC code. That software will break under Lion, as Lion no longer includes Rosetta. Users who loved AppleWorks, Eudora, and Office 2004 were the hardest hit. There is a compatibility table here: http://roaringapps.com/apps:table Lion is not "buggy" or "unstable." That is, it isn't if you do a clean install. If, like most folks, you do a simple update install over Snow Leopard, and especially if you were a Snow Leopard user prior to installing Lion, there is a good chance that you will re- install stay-resident software that isn't fully Lion compatible, and which will make your Mac frustratingly unstable. Going back and doing a clean install is a pain, but will fix that problem if you encounter it. HOW TO: Do a Clean Install of OS X Lion http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=D66E0D60-1A64-6A71-CEB596DEDA566CA3 http://feeds.mashable.com/~r/Mashable/~3/yWXqguXQPcA/ Lion has only one new killer feature, and that's iCloud. If you can do without iCloud, you may be best off sticking with Snow Leopard. Mountain Lion (OS X 10.8) will be showing up any day now. Literally. Assuming that your Mac meets the specs to run it, you may want to wait for it: http://is.gd/QtNAGp ___________________________________________ Randy B. Singer Co-author of The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th, and 6th editions) Macintosh OS X Routine Maintenance http://www.macattorney.com/ts.html ___________________________________________