On 2003-04-22 06:00, mentholiptus wrote: > On Monday, April 21, 2003, at 10:53 PM, Todd Masco wrote: > >> mentholiptus wrote: >> >>> That's fine, because I don't care. I was just commenting on how I've noticed >>> the same spam that gnarlodious had, >> >> But because of the context, you were implying agreement that the address had >> been obtained through this list. >> >> Laurie very effectively debunked that claim, even if she overstated your >> involvement in the process. >> >> The notion that "ASCII encoding" email addresses will stop spammers is not >> credible. Sure, it'll stop some of them, but not all - most text-based >> browsers will automatically convert it to the email address without the user >> ever knowing how the source appeared. > > Why are you so anti the possibility that the spam DID come from here? Maybe it > did, yet, maybe it didn't. Either way, I've also been getting spam lately. And > we're both on this list...so I felt like offering that up. > > Why do claims need to be debunked anyway? If they do, then PROVE that it > DIDN'T come from this list. They don't need to. But I find it somewhat important to note that Rachel is wrong when stating, "my sites are protected, therefore it DEFINITELY is this list's fault I am getting spam." Which, as demonstrated by Todd above, is simply not necessarily true. > Otherwise, who cares. Exactly. You, apparently. ,xtG .tsooJ -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <o))>< <o))>< <o))>< <o))>< <o))>< <o))>< <o))>< \V/ _______|_______\|/_______V_\/vV_________\|/_____ -- Joost van de Griek <http://www.jvdg.net/>