On Tuesday, April 22, 2003, at 06:48 AM, Joost van de Griek wrote: > They don't need to. But I find it somewhat important to note that > Rachel is > wrong when stating, "my sites are protected, therefore it DEFINITELY > is this > list's fault I am getting spam." Which, as demonstrated by Todd above, > is > simply not necessarily true. Ok, whatever. I think everyone here is 50% right. and 100% unwilling to accept that they're 50% wrong. >> Otherwise, who cares. > > Exactly. You, apparently. > > ,xtG > .tsooJ So you agree with me, then tell me I don't agree with myself. Oy. jesse .