On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 08:56 PM, John T. Folden wrote: > 1920 by 1200 (stretched) > > It looks like the GF4MX has the same problem. The GF2MX > and GF3 do not. That doesn't make sense though....wouldn't it be stretched if it was 1600x1200? 1920x1200 is 1600x1200 with an extra 320 pixels on either side to give it a wider aspect ratio... 1024x768 (or 1600x1200) stretched makes sense, but 1920x1200 is the native res... Confused. jesse .