On 2003-02-11 03:22, "Rick Rodman" <richard.rodman at verizon.net> wrote: > On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:30 PM, Laurie A Duncan wrote: > >> On 2/10/03 12:53 PM, gnarlodious at cybermesa.com typeth: >> >>> Sniping is the slimy bidding practice of entering a bid 20 seconds before >>> the auction closes. You know they can't enter a bid in the short time >>> remaining. >> >> What some call slimy, others call strategy. There is nothing illegal or >> unethical about it - although using one of the paid sniping services I do >> believe crosses the line into unethical. > > It's irritating and unfair from the seller's standpoint, however. What > happens is you hope to get $50 for an item, but 10 bidders wait for the > last minute and all place bids at once. One wins at $5; the others are > outbid and all you get is $5, even though there were 10 bidders. Be that as it may, if you set a starting price that low with no reserve, you indicate that you are willing to sell, even at that price. You can hope to get a much higher price all you want; putting it up for auction is no guarantee that you will, and you know it. Reserves can be set for a reason, you know. > As a frequent seller, I definitely consider sniping "slimy". I've suggested > many times to eBay that the auction should automatically be extended on any > winning bid - LIKE A REAL AUCTION - and of course they have ignored it, > because that would be too hard to program. I strongly suspect that they have other reasons, because implementing that would be laughably easy. ,xtG .tsooJ -- /~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign: \ / - No HTML/RTF in email X - No Word docs in email / \ - Respect for open standards -- Joost van de Griek <http://www.jvdg.net/>