Yeah, and 10.5.2 is coming out very soon and is going to be a large update: http://www.itwire.com/content/view/15882/53/ This should fix MANY issues. Also, I wonder if there are issues with the PowerPC version of Leopard that the Intel version does not have vice versa. Just a thought. On Dec 28, 2007 11:46 AM, Riba <riba at ml1.net> wrote: > > On 2007.12.28, at 15:48, Stefan wrote: > > >> > >> From my experience Leopard seems to run a bit smoother than > >> Tiger...it is certainly not slower. On a stock 450 MHz Cube. > > > > Hello Riba, > > > > this is really interesting news. > > > > I hesitated to buy Leopard at all... > > > > One of my cubes runs with Powerlogix 1.5 GHz upgrade, the other at > > original 450 MHz, both with 10.4.x. > > > > I would be very interested to get some more reviews how fast your > > upgraded cubes run with Leopard compared with Tiger ??? > > > > Personal impressions are at least better than official numbers. > > From what I've heard from other people, Leopard is usually equal or > snappier than Tiger on the same hardware. Keep in mind that the > feeling does not come form the raw speed of the operations - the new > finder in multithreaded and more responsive, quick view speeds most of > your tasks, the network (samba) stuff is significiantly improved. I > hesitated until recently as well, but after doing it I would recommend > the update. > > I have it running on 1.5 MHz Powerbook and stock Cube. > > _______________________________________________ > Cube mailing list > Cube at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/cube > -- Seth Maynard Sethwm2 at gmail.com ----------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/cube/attachments/20071228/dc54b38e/attachment.html