Apple's responsibility to 2400's?

[ELN/rlf9]

Duo/2400 List wrote...

>Subject: [Duo2400] Apple's responsibility to 2400's?
>From: rminton at commscope.com
>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:02:54 -0500
>Message-ID: <OF3EF9C1AE.DE79D89B-ON85256CAE.004CA47B at commscope.com>
>
>
>Just curious, in view of all the problems that 5300's had and the
>repair/trade -in programs offered as a result why hasn't Apple taken a
>similar approach to 2400's?  The GLOD symptom definitely is a very inherent
>design defect and is as bad or worse than anything (other than "flaming
>batteries") that the 5300's had.  Is it just a matter of enough people
>starting an organized action towards having Apple address this?
>
>Randy

Nah. They sure don't care about the faulty hinge issue on Wallstreets 
despite years of organized action, for example.

Bob F