On 12/25/03, sr ferenczy <srf7425 at rit.edu> wrote: > > if you ignore meaningless numbers, and focus instead upon release > dates, the OS 7-8 timeline really falls quite close to the os X > timeline in regards to paid releases. (maybe apple just wants to keep > os X around for a long while, thus they use all the 10.* combinations > they can.... > > Oct 1991 7.0 paid > Oct 1992 7.1 paid > Sept 1994 7.5 paid > Jan 1997 7.6 paid > July 1997 8.0 paid > Oct 1998 8.5 paid > Oct 1999 9.0 paid > Mar 2001 10.0 paid (public beta) > Oct 2001 10.1 paid (many consider first "real" os x) > Aug 2002 10.2 paid > June 2003 10.3 paid > > looks to me like apple has stayed pretty consistent in regards to paid > updates, other than changing their numbering system.... And as seen on <http://www.resexcellence.com/index.shtml>: Concerning paying for Apple's software updates, Joshua Ochs writes: Based on their history, if it comes out over a year after the last major upgrade, then it's valid to charge for it. Here's the history, folks: 7.0: paid (5/91) 7.1: free (8/92) 7.5: paid (6/95) (4 years, 1 month since last paid upgrade) 7.6: free (1/97) 8.0: paid (6/97) (2 years since last paid upgrade) 8.1: free (1/98) 8.5: paid (10/98) (1 year, 4 months since last paid upgrade) 8.6: free (5/99) 9.0: paid (10/99) (1 year since last paid upgrade) 9.1: free (1/01) 9.2: free (6/01) 10.0: paid (3/01) (1 year, 5 months since last paid upgrade) 10.1: free (9/01) 10.2: paid (8/02) (1 year, 5 months since last paid upgrade) 10.3: paid (10-03) (1 year, 2 months since last paid upgrade) Happy holidays.