On Nov 6, 2004, at 22:46, Ronald Steinke wrote: > On 5 Nov, 2004, at 20:36, Rod wrote: > > I'm actually a Apple Service Technician, and I have had a good look > around > the motherboard. None of the screws have been touched ie there are no > screwdriver marks on the screw heads. It would have stood out if the > cpu > baard had been removed. > > I'm not a certified AST, but I take enough care that I don't leave > buggered up screw heads in the machines that I work on. Not having > marks on the screws doesn't necessarily mean that the cpu had not been > changed out. > > Now, if Apple were to use a thread-lock liquid/sealer like BMW does, > it would show up in a New York minute that someone had been tinkering > with the insides of the machine and you would have reason to suspect > evil-doings. In their thriftiness, Apple leaves out this step in the > manufacturing and makes it possible to change all sorts of equipment > without leaving a trace. > > I have no knowledge of units leaving the factory with incorrect > labeling (except for a few "500 MHz" machines that were actually only > 450 MHz because of physical limits on the mobo), so it seems to me > that there was indeed a change of processor chips at some time in the > past by a previous owner. > > It is labeled correctly or incorrectly, which choice you make is up to > you, but I would go with the original label and look for the reason > for the inconsistency. > Another thing to look at is the sales order number and the serial number. Sometimes units get factory refurbished with different parts. The serial # and sales order # can help track that down, 'bones