Yes, I read the article. The reason why I asked if you modified Leopard is because of the problem I am having with Leopard after successfully installing it. It is running very sluggishly, using all of my CPU. I wondered if you modified Leopard somehow to run "Leopard Lite," the way Vista is modified to run on PC's with limited abilities. On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:15 PM, John Baltutis wrote: > Just modified the install file as noted in the second link. Did you > read it? > > On 11/12/07, Bill Scott <wscott at optonline.net> wrote: >> >> Did you have to do anything to Leopard to enable it to work on a 450 >> Mac? Anything you disabled or modified? >> >> On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:19 AM, John Baltutis wrote: >>> On 11/10/07, "O'Brien" <obgraph at hiwaay.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:22:05 -0500 (EST), arricam at 295.ca wrote: >>>>> Lots of talk about Leopard OS. >>>>> Is there any hidden surprises? >>>> >>>> As I understand, Leopard won't run well on less than a 1gHz G4. >>>> >>>> There's been a LOT of discussion on the OSX group: >>>> >>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/macosx-support/ >>> >>> You understand wrongly, then. It runs faster than 10.4.10 on my >>> unsupported G4, >>> 450 MP. FWIW, as noted a couple of weeks ago, I used the >>> technigue at >>> <http://blog.kupferman.net/?p=3> to modify a cloned install disk on >>> an internal HD and external FWHD. > _______________________________________________ > G4 mailing list > G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4