On 11/13/07, John Niven <senseamp at yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:19 AM, John Baltutis wrote: >> On 11/10/07, "O'Brien" <obgraph at hiwaay.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:22:05 -0500 (EST), arricam at 295.ca wrote: >>>> Lots of talk about Leopard OS. Are there any hidden surprises? >>> >>> As I understand, Leopard won't run well on less than a 1gHz G4. >>> There's been a LOT of discussion on the OSX group: >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/macosx-support/ >>> >>> You understand wrongly, then. It runs faster than 10.4.10 on my >>> unsupported G4, 450 MP, 1.5 GB RAM > > I have a three DP 450's at home. It would be nice to > still run the latest OS if there is no downside. What > makes you say that your machine is faster with Leopard? > Gut feel or did you run some bench marks? I must say > that I got the impression that 10.4 was faster than 10.3, > but many people said 10.3 was the one to stick at for G4's. Sorry for the delay. I'm on digest and just got this. I beta-tested the cat, so ran it for over a year on the G4 and my mate's 1GHz 17" flat-panel iMac. That and reports from other beta-testers indicated every incremental build brought some speed increase in one area or another. I still run 10.4.11 on a daily basis and think stuff loads faster, Safari's snappier, etc. No other benchmarks, but I've beta-tested Panther, Tiger, and Leopard, so my experience is what I base my conclusion on.