Doug Burton wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2008, at 1:03 PM, John Niven wrote: > >> Doug, >> >> you didn't answer the question. So explain to us why >> you think 1.5Gb/s is the same as 150Mb/s ? >> >> Since the industry chooses to specify SATA drives that >> way, I thought it would less confussing to use the >> marketing terms you see on the package. >> >> John > It's not the same and I never said it was. Here is the original quote > from YOUR post. > > -------- > The analogy: parallel ATA hose uses a wide, low > pressure pipe to fill a bucket, whereas serial ATA > uses a thin pipe but running at a very high pressure > to push the same, or more, water through in a given > time. > > ATA133 = 133Mbytes per second. > SATA = 1.5Gbits per second. > > I believe these two are comparable in throughput. I don't. If a byte still contains 8 bits, 1.5 Gbits equal 1.064 Gbytes. Seems there's a confusion here, in MB vs. Mb, and so on. Seems to me MB = Megabytes, while Mb = megabits. keith whaley