> Sorry. but just because *you* happen to have an older machine that > pre-dates the flagging in no way means that anyone here can simply > purcahse data CDRs and record on them successfully in deck-based CD > Recorder. > > Regardless, the first poster claimed there was absolutely no > difference, I pointed out that there was in fact a difference. > > What I wrote is perfectly correct, unless you are being overly pedantic. Your original post implied that _all_ CDs that are labelled as being for audio were of the licensed variety and would not work in anything other than a stand-alone CD burner. This is not the case. If I go to my local record store, I'll have to search pretty hard for the licence-paid CDs, whereas I can find plenty of ordinary CDs that are marked as being for audio. They tend to be more expensive than data CDs, but in many cases there _is_ no difference except for the packaging and the price. Here in the UK, where we didn't sign up for the Athens agreement that promoted the so-called consumer CD-R system using licence-paid discs, the current generation of domestic stand-alone CD burners, at least from Philips, do not require the licence-paid discs and will work perfectly well with any high-quality CD-R and, in fact, with CD-RW disks as well. They cost around $300, which is probably well within the financial capabilities of many people on this list. I'm sorry if you feel that I'm being pedantic or in some way threatening your authority, but your categorical statement that what Kunga posted was "absolutely false" failed to note the difference between the different types of CD blanks and different types of CD recorder. Regards. John Leonard Aura Sound Design Ltd. 23 Charlotte Road, Shoreditch London EC2A 3PB Tel: +44 (0)20 7739 6057 Fax: +44 (0)20 7729 1820 http://www.aurasound.co.uk