Not every photo is going to match the 4 x 3 width to height ratio of a television screen... so I do things a little differently than some of the other posters suggested. The end result is (as with their methods) more pixels... which means you can zoom in to smaller areas without breakup. I generally scan with Photoshop at 300 DPI using a 6" (printed size) dimension for the longest side of the photo. I don't worry so much about the aspect ratio, although I do crop before scanning to improve the composition or eliminate unwanted stuff in the picture. That method gives me a file with enough pixels to zoom in without having to do a bunch of math. 300 DPI also give me a file with enough resolution for many kinds of print work or photo print out. On Feb 23, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Macintosh Digital Video List wrote: > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:41:24 -0800 > From: Ray Statham <raystatham at shaw.ca> > Subject: [MacDV] pixels > Message-id: <194A7F1B-656F-11D8-8457-000A9578422C at shaw.ca> > > Hi Everyone, > > Can anyone straighten me out with the business of square/nonsquare > pixels? I'm doing a short project in FCP which requires me to import > still images for zooming and panning, and I'm not sure how to handle > it. Do I need to do anything in the scanning stage to prevent distorted > images, or does FCP have a way of automatically dealing with this? > > Ray > > > ------------------------------ > Ted Langdell Ted Langdell Creative Broadcast Services Marysville, CA Main: (530) 741-1212 Pager: (530) 770-6516