> Richard - thank you for your willingness to speak in support of > bringing data to the table. The debate isn't about MacOS 9 (though > systems using HFS+ filesystems will be broadly similar to MacOS X). > A number of people have vociferously (not to say stubbornly and > illogically) given their opinion that defragmenting disks makes I/O > faster in MacOS 10.x. I have challenged this claim, and asked the > proponents to produce the data in support of their belief. I spend zero time proving silly arguments to people who spend hours pursuing a dream of being right. Therefore, in the great scheme of time well spent, I think I win, and you win bupkiss. > So far no one has produced any evidence. You understand that it is up > to those making a claim to produce the evidence in support, right? The > person who disbelieves a claim is entitled to ask for the evidence on > which it is based. None has been produced, nor will it be, since the > belief is bogus. If you make a claim "A", and someone says "I don't > believe you", then you lose the argument if you can't support your > claim, e.g. if your response is "bupkiss, whatever works for you" or > "prove it". Really? Prove this supposition. > Regardless, when I get the time, I will write some benchmarks to show > (one way or the other) that "defragmenting" a disk does nothing of > significance for I/O performance for MacOS 10.3. Never said it did. Said it did in 9. You got wax in your ears?