You might be right, especially if the heads are not perfectly aligned, the other track might be close enough for the head pick up the sound. As I said, I am just assuming (should not do that on a public forum ;-) Rauno. Brett Conlon wrote: >I always thought that the low sound heard on audio tapes during quiet bits >was the heads picking up what is on the reverse side of the tape. It often >sounded somewhat backwards to me. > >Coj > > > >Rauno Teravainen <lrdomus at earthlink.net> > >My take on it has always been that the erase head just cannot get the >old pattern completely of the tape, you can hear that also on analog >audio cassettes, when the music is very low or a complete silence, there >is a faint "left-over" from the previous recording, until the higher >volume of the new recording "kills" it. The "left-over" could also be >detected as bits on the DV, I assume, until the dynamic range of the >"active" signal suppresses it. I have never researched this, just an >old belief coming from the analog audio era. Don't shoot me for this, >just rambling. > >Rauno. > >