[MacDV] 2GHz iMac v's 2.3GHz (dual) tower
Mark M. Florida
markf at squareblue.com
Tue May 31 09:04:26 PDT 2005
I'd argue that you'd be better off with a single processor G5 for
roughly the same price as an iMac:
- faster frontside bus (900 MHz vs. 667 MHz) -- a single 1.8 GHz G5
Power Mac would probably be just as fast as the 2 GHz iMac G5
- more memory slots (add what you need now, and leave room for more in
the future)
- two hard drive bays -- sure you could just add FireWire drives to the
iMac, but internal drives are much faster and more reliable (don't have
to deal with sketchy FireWire bridges, etc.)
Apple right now has a refurb 1.8 GHz G5 for $1299, add a 20" Cinema
display for $799, and you're just $100 over the $2k price of the much
more limited iMac (or get a 20" Dell display for even less -- same LCD,
different enclosure).
The issue is expandibility. And while it's no MDD G4 (4 internal hard
drive bays, 2 optical drive bays, 4 PCI slots), it's MUCH more
expandable than an iMac. But if you want the neat package an iMac
offers, then maybe that's more important -- in my opinion, for video
work, the Power Mac with greater expandibility makes more sense.
- Mark
More information about the MacDV
mailing list