That's a knee-slapper as some folk say in these parts. I'm not so sure that I can provide a lot of technical details why WMV is inferior over then through my own use, which can hardly be called "professional", I get better results using Quicktime. I'm sure you can find some technical details buried in the following link, if I find a good article I'll pass it along: http://www.google.com/search?q=wmv+vs+quicktime&btnG=Search&complete=1&hl=en&lr= Greg On 1/17/07, Brian Olesky <brian4 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > On 1/17/07 8:27 AM, "Richard Gilmore" <rgilmor at uwo.ca> wrote: > > > My boss tells me WMV is the ³best video codec² out there. I don¹t really > > believe him but I was wondering about people¹s opinions on this. How > good is > > QT vs WMV? > > Are you sure he didn't say "worst?" > > _______________________________________________ > MacDV mailing list > MacDV at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/macdv > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/macdv/attachments/20070118/40c6b3dd/attachment.html