on 5/30/03 7:17 AM, Charlie Moody at shaman at mac.com wrote: > Frankly, I had no idea that audio setup was so regular a part of using > VV - thanks for the heads-up! > > I may have left an erroneous impression w/ my question: I am not > looking for a 'set-&-forget' solution on the sound profile "issue". I > find that, after working with & correcting VV in loud circumstances for > several sessions (& accompanying voice-model updates), and establishing > improved accuracy, then when I shift to working in a quiet office (w > audio set-up), the accuracy deteriorates; I then have to re-train it > to resotre accuracy to what had been achieved in the other sound > environment. > > My worry is that, by training and re-training a single model in both > environments, I may be (in effect) corrupting the model; certainly it > is redundant, irritating & time-consuming. In other words, I see the > wisdom of having 2 voice models, and I'm all for it. > > All I was trying to do was / is figure out how to have a second voice > model without having to go through reading those damn' stories again, > et cetera, et cetera. > > Since I haven't tried to set up a second voice model, perhaps I'm > merely jumping to conclusions, assuming the worst. Does adding a voice > model involve starting entirely from scratch? > > I believe so. While one could "cheat" and make a copy of the 1st voice model, what would be the point? It would defeat the purpose of having both a "loud" and "soft" model. Starting from scratch is the best way. (BTW, having had VV since the poorly implemented version 1, I practically know the damn stories by heart!).