>My worry is that, by training and re-training a single model in both >environments, I may be (in effect) corrupting the model; certainly >it is redundant, irritating & time-consuming. In other words, I see >the wisdom of having 2 voice models, and I'm all for it. > >All I was trying to do was / is figure out how to have a second >voice model without having to go through reading those damn' stories >again, et cetera, et cetera. There is no way to create a second voice model without reading the training stories again. Reading the trading stories is essential to generating data the computer uses when creating a voice model. I myself have multiple voice models to account for varying conditions. Although I never had a problem with corruption when using a single voice model I found the time involved in continuously retraining to be prohibitive. It was well worth the time for me to create a second voice model and switch between them as necessary (while being sure to run Audio Setup after switching). -- ---------- T. Patrick Henebry