On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:59:34PM -0600, Loren Schooley wrote: > > > Becasue then, HTML wouldn't be optional for that > > functionality, > > Yes, it would, and presently IS an option for most regular lists. > Please explain how HTML -- required for your solution -- is optional for those who desire said functionality? I believe the original request was simple, elegant, and applied equally well to HTML and plaintext digests, leaving HTML as optional. Your approach does not. -- Mark C. Langston Sr. Unix SysAdmin mark at bitshift.org mark at seti.org Systems & Network Admin SETI Institute http://bitshift.org http://www.seti.org