[Ti] utility for defragmenting my internal HAD?

Luke Mazzeri etyrnal at ameritech.net
Fri Dec 20 15:31:08 PST 2002


On Saturday, December 21, 2002, at 12:36 AM, Mark C. Langston wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 04:09:50PM -0800, Brett V. Gaspers wrote:
>> Um...hate to say the emperor is wearing no clothes here, but isn't
>> the filesystem used by OSX AND OS9 HFS+? And this is the same
>> filesystem we've been using for several years?
>>
>> Or are you talking about UFS? (which very few Mac users are or should 
>> be using)
>
>
> It seems my understanding, and thus my explanation, were incomplete.
> Since I mentioned inodes, the description I gave would more accurately
> pertain to UFS.  However, OS X uses HFS+ (whereas OS 9 uses HFS (no
> plus)).


My machines have all been HFS+ since OS 8.6

Been using HFS+ for YEARS...

not HFS

and as far as i'm aware the block size in HFS+ is always 512 - so i 
imagine there is very little waste.






---
http://www.mp3.com/lukeetyrnal   (music no one likes)
etyrnal at ameritech.net



More information about the Titanium mailing list