On Dec 30, 2003, at 12:45 PM, Chris Olson wrote: > The processor is set to Highest performance, but I never considered > the CHUD tools, nor did I consider the difference in processor cache. > Since ESRI ArcExplorer is a Java-based app, I have made sure all my > updates relating to Java are current. I looked into this phenomenon last evening, and near as I can determine, the Power Mac's cpu just has more bandwidth and power than the laptop cpu, and it also has dramatically better disk I/O performance. The Power Mac scores ~145 on the cpu test while the laptop scores ~135 in Xbench. The Power Mac virtually blows the laptop right off its feet, spits on it while it's laying on the ground, and stomps it into a bloody mass in the disk test. Since the datasets aren't actually loaded to memory until you click on the render checkbox in ArcExplorer, and the datasets won't fit into one GB of RAM, I suspect the difference in disk i/o time is what is causing the huge slowdown with the PowerBook. I snipped part of the output of Xbench and pasted the appropriate data here: ********* Power Mac ************* Disk Test 123.92 Sequential 138.10 Uncached Write 146.37 61.01 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 114.39 46.84 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 188.63 29.86 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 123.61 49.94 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 112.38 Uncached Write 124.40 1.87 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 115.27 26.00 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 99.44 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 113.32 23.32 MB/sec [256K blocks] ********* PowerBook ************* Disk Test 38.54 Sequential 42.16 Uncached Write 34.78 14.50 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 38.28 15.67 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 71.40 11.30 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 38.48 15.55 MB/sec [256K blocks] Random 35.49 Uncached Write 21.75 0.33 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Write 38.93 8.78 MB/sec [256K blocks] Uncached Read 52.43 0.35 MB/sec [4K blocks] Uncached Read 45.50 9.36 MB/sec [256K blocks] -- Chris