On 5/1/03 18:24, "b" wrote: >> n 5/1/03 4:46, "Trevor J. Hutley" wrote: >> >>> My feeling - before any announcement from Apple - was that somewhere >>> between ¢10 and ¢25 >> >> I understand Apple gets about 1/4 of the total price, (meaning $.75 goes >> elsewhere). This would eliminate 10 to 25 cents a piece. >> >> An just think, why would music companies allow there songs to be sold do >> cheap. $1.20 an album? Except for the productions costs, which are minimal, >> they would be making factor of 10 less per CD. >> >> And what would an artist make per CD? $.005 per CD on a million sales is >> only $5000. Not a lot for a million seller. > > @ 75 cents to the music co, and with a 6.5% royalty to the artist > (more or less) = 4.5 to 5.5 cents per track X a million? 45 to 55 > thousand per single. But, the reality is that most artists [save for > all but the most established big sellers] derive the bulk of their > income from touring and merchandise sales. Still, an extra 50 grand > here, 50 grand there, pretty soon, it adds up. > > ~flipper I was figuring on the $.10 person, $1.20 per album (12 songs) example. Using 6.5% (which I don't know if they could get that given costs) that gives an artist $78,000 per million sales per album. Doesn't seem like a lot (and must be a lot less than they are used to). -- Roger