>Last, benchmark testing, using similar software running real world tests >across different platforms is the BEST way to make cross-platform >comparisons. Photoshop 7 tests are a great way to do cross platform >comparisons. I don't draw any similarities between these benchmark testing >procedures and your analogy. Please explain your analogy. Adobe tries to >optimize it's software for the individual platforms. In most cases they use >optimized compilers to run the same algorithms. Running multiple tests over >and over and comparing times across platforms is probably the best way to >compare hardware performance. First, sorry about the Microsoft/intel faux pax; it's been a rough week ;-) Second, if you want to base your buying decisions on benchmarks then find the one the benefits your favorite platform. Apple's benchmark tests always show it to out-perform intel/windows counterparts; intel has benchmarks that show the opposite; and their are varying "independent" results as well. What flipper said: theory has little or no basis in practice. These cross platforms tests are great fodder for mailing list debates, and marketing execs, but little else. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Mike Bigley Maineville, Ohio http://www.norbertrunning.com Please support an American Indian Elder & Medicine Man by visiting the above link. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>