Agreed concerning FrameMaker. When not using FrameMaker in Classic, I am using it on my Sun workstation. Jerry K Chris Olson wrote: > On Dec 4, 2005, at 7:03 AM, William Scammell wrote: > >> I find PM is better for large books, while I prefer Quirk for short >> docs or adverts. (I haven't had enough time to really start digging >> into InDesign. Bad designer, No biscuit!!!) > > > Our technical writers still use FrameMaker on PowerMac G3's running OS > 9 for large heavily formatted technical documentation/layout. We > looked at InDesign on OS X as a replacement for FrameMaker. However, > InDesign CS2 is still more ideally suited to short documents and our > trial runs with it failed. > > Our PowerMac G3/266's are almost 9 years old and are due for > replacement. Adobe's failure to port FrameMaker to OS X, and Apple's > roadmap with lack of Classic support on the x86 Macs, was the final > nail in the coffin for our technical documentation people. They'll be > going to Windows in Q1 2006 so we can get support for our software.