On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:16:16AM +0300, Dr. Trevor J. Hutley wrote: > At 13:59 -0800 5/3/05, Bill Fox wrote: > >You will get a lot of opinions on this because it is a tough choice. > > > >>But I'm having last minute second thoughts that > >>maybe I should consider the 17 inch PowerBook > >>instead. I'd really appreciate input from > >>anyone who made that same decision and how they > >>feel about it after the fact. > > All of this adds up to a big demand on screen > real-estate. I think that withoiut Exposé, I > would be lost with 'just' a 15" screen. > > Of course, I manage, and have no complaints. But > I feel that I am in this transition, such that > now, for the first time, I wonder if my next > Powerbook might be the 17"...... especially if > present trends continue. > > For me right now, it is more speed that I need, > rather than more screen. But a moe toa 17" wold > provide upgrades on both, from where I am now, > and that might represent an increasingly > attractive combination. Lots of good opinions running around, and I think in the end it will depend on what you're using it for. For me personally, as a developer, I value screen real estate quite highly. I have a Ti 667 GE, which only has an 1152x768 screen resolution - it's a killer. I've *LOVE* to have a 1600x1200 screen in the 15" form factor. For work I use an IBM T42 with 1400x1050 on a 15" screen, and just a bit more would be perfect. I'll be first in line when Apple ups the display resolution to 1600+... BTW, the T42 has UNBELIEVABLE wireless reception! Much better than even my SO's iBook, which itself puts the TiBook to shame. Too bad it's not a Mac... -- Paul H. Yoshimune paul at yoshimune.com http://www.yoshimune.com/