On Nov 28, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Mikael Byström wrote: > Currently he uses a dual 2.5 G5 with 4GB RAM. Findings and > speculations that the OS X kernel could perform a lot better > doesn't make him much happier. On PowerPC it's made up for with AltiVec on the desktop and will be transparent to your music/video editing friend. The reference you refer to on anandtech uses MySQL as a threading performance benchmark on servers. Spawning threads quickly on servers like MySQL and Apache is very important for performance. OS X flat isn't an enterprise server platform - it gets blown right out of the water by both linux and Windows Server. However, virtually all modern high-end OS X desktop apps are vectorized applications and you won't notice any kernel threading issues if they're written correctly. If you're a developer it wouldn't hurt to consult ADC Technical Note 2028: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2028.html > Would VMWares current featureset let you run OS X and Windows side > by side? It'll let you run Mac OS X for x86 in a virtual machine on a Windows or linux desktop. However, Apple's EULA is somewhat restrictive, so this is illegal if it's not on Apple-branded hardware. Despite that, you can download a VMWare x86 OS X image and run it now if you want - it's been hacked, TPM code removed, and leaked on to BitTorrent. > If they ever will support OS X that is. Anyone know if there have > been any announced support plans for OS X? There's no plans announced. But you can rest assured VMWare will be available for OS X on x86, as will Codeweavers' Crossover Office. As far as that goes, WINE (the free community supported version of X- over) will be available for MacTel eventually too, which is a better solution because it removes the need to run a Windows operating system to run Windows-based software. The DarWINE project is located here: http://darwine.opendarwin.org -- Chris ------------------------- PGP Key: http://astcomm.net/~chris/PGP_Public_Key/ -------------------------