Dr Trevor J. Hutley wrote: > > On 22 Sep 2005, at 02:37, Chris Olson wrote: > > >> Apple needs to advertise. I mean, go to Apple's website right now >> and what do you see on the front page? The iPod nano. > > > Chris - first, thanks for that info about the Lenovo hZ60t Widescreen > titanium notebook. Pretty impressive, incredible price. > Although when I looked in detail at the site, I do not see much > difference when we compare like with like/same specification. > > I agree with your point about advertising. Advertising and > education, I think are needed. > If YOU think there is little advertising, and you are in the 'home > country', imagine how it is elsewhere. > > Here in Saudi Arabia, there is a new generation of Saudis who know > practically nothing about Apple. > > I had one student, who in his spare time runs a computer shop, who > asked me what my laptop was. I said look at the (Apple) logo. It > meant nothing to hin ! I have only found one student at the College > who has an iPod, and 1 member of staff. iPod is unknown to more than > 99.9% of the people. Only the Media Centre have a (G5) Mac for > publishing work. > > A junior staff member came to me the other day and said he wanted > some advice about buying a laptop. He showed me a price list with a > Dell 15..4" screen and all the bells and whistles (Bluetooth, > wireless, long battery life) for at least $700 cheaper than the > equivalent Powerbook. I could muster no arguments as to why this was > not the best option for him. > I was in the IT Department this week at the College and looked at > their standard textbook on "Operating Systems". Not even a mention > of Apple or Mac anywhere. Talk about monopoly ! Most people here (> > 99%) don't even know there is a choice or an alternative. > > So I come somewhat reluctantly to the same conclusions as you, that > more advertising and communication is need (bring back the > evangelists), serious re-design is needed to cut out costs, margins > have to move down, prices have to move down. > > The Lenovo machine may have broken the paradigm of cheap and nasty. > Well designed and cheap seems a new market segment that previously > never exised. I predict it is on a growth track. > > I think that it is unrealistic to expect that Mac-OSX-for-Intel will > stay on Apple hardware. I believe that there will be a huge driving > force to make it run on 1/2 price (Dell, Lenovo) laptops. This force > will at least activate hackers, but probably will be strong enough to > drive Apple policy, even if reluctantly. > > We are at a very interesting juncture in the development of the > laptop. In my recent proposals for a new building (2y out) at the > College, I wrote that all staff should have wireless laptops. More > than half the desk-space in every office here is taken over with huge > ugly old CRT monitors, big boxes, thick cables and clunky keyboards > (all this from new HP/Compaq PCs running XP). My laptop is the same > screen size, far better resolution and only a tiny footprint, and a > pleasure to work with. But will those laptops be Macs or Lenovo ? > Interesting question. > > Myself, I know that I could not achieve the productivity I have with > my Al-book, Mac OS X and Keynote® with a cheap PC laptop. > How much is it worth to me? Probably a lot. But for those who are > not power-users? Maybe the advantages are worth much less, and the > new well-designed-and-cheap laptop may scoop some people. > > regards, Trevor > > > _______________________________________________ > Titanium mailing list > Titanium at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/titanium > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 > Thanks, Trev! Very thoughtfully written. Best, Henry