paulatx1 at aol.com said: >I can remember in the past that the limitations assigned to some >computer ram was due to what was currently available in ram sizes. >And I do know for sure that I have more ram installed in my original >clamshell laptop than it was originally supposed to support. (And I >remember that my blue iMac did NOT recognize more than they said it >would.) >It would be tempting to get two one gig ram chips for my Ti...but that >would be $700. At this time though, even an additional $350 is too >much to shell out just for the heck of it. (So...if someone else out >there is running laptops with more ram than it is supposed to support, >please let us know!) Well, limitations of the largest RAM available at the time of release of the machine and its maximum possible addressable RAM are possibly 2 different kinds of limitations. The latter being the only real measurement. I haven't heard of anyone attempting to have more than 1GB RAM in a Titanium though, so that may be its maximum addressable amount. Anyone know for sure or know of other limitations affecting this amount? I think the G5 have 8GB maximum, but in theory a 64bit system can address hundreds of thousands.