at 8:58 PM (EDT) on 5/30/08 Ralph LEWIS wrote: >> After all, isn't this kind of behavior >> more like the Apple we all know where decisions aren't to benefit the >> end user so much as to benefit the bottom line, like any corporation? >> >This is the most insulting comment I have seen in a long time, In my >long association servicing apple computers and their users, I have >found Apple to be the most user friendly maker of equipment and >software that I have ever run across. Who did I insult? Forgive me for suggesting that Apple is in it for the money. I guess they just make these huge profits and high margins by accident? Yes, they've been highly successful making great equipment and that's why we're all Mac users and probably always will be. But they don't do it because they are filled with love for humanity. If there is a decision that will benefit the bottom line even if it hurts the user experience Apple won't hesitate to make it. It would be extremely silly of them to do otherwise. Macs don't have to be the best possible machines imaginable, just better than the other crap out there, not such a high bar actually. Apple's first and only loyalty is to the bottom line. Anything else would be irrational. Whatever else Jobs is, he isn't irrational. If you ever find yourself thinking otherwise you're drinking the kool aid. I have nothing against Apple. I've been a loyal customer since the Apple II (or ][ if you prefer). I've never owned any other type of computer (apart from a few PowerTower Mac clones), would never let anyone I care about own any other computer, raised my kids on Macs, run my business on Macs etc. etc. but one can be a loyal customer and still refuse to be naive about corporate behavior. CL