On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 03:45 AM, Eugene Lee wrote: > : Thank you for the interesting citation. But have a look at: > : > : http://www.bynkii.com/generic_mac_stuff/archives/000091.html > > There are number of hurdles in OS X that make life much more difficult > for virus writers. That article focuses on the ability to *write* a virus for the Mac. Of course, you can write a virus for any computer. The thing that makes it likely to get a virus (and attractive for the writers) is how the virus is spread. Windows is better at that because the OS is guided by two contradictory philosophies: a) make an open platform for applications in a secure business LAN and b) make a secure platform for home use on the internet. Unixes are written with security concepts integrated from the ground up, while Windows is torn between security and providing features that enable programs like Outlook and Exchange Server. PC users will also point out that PCs can be *made* secure, its just that the users don't update or configure them correctly. This is true, but you have to remember that its not just Aunt Molly the PC Newbie who gets PC viruses - business users get them, corporate IT departments get them, ISPs get them. You don't have to be a professional to see that its much more difficult to secure a PC than a Unix box. This also comes from the same root issue that the PC is driven by two contradictory design philosophies. A long legacy of creating incremental capabilities and security features has made Windows administration essentially anti-conceptual. Its not that Unix is simple to administer and Windows is complex - both operating systems are very complex. But unix is conceptually unified and Windows is not. Having a unified consistent design philosophy and an a consistent environment has always been important for Unix and Apple, while the PC has focused on getting things done. While Microsoft is responsible in some ways for the virus phenomenon, you also have to remember that the cheap products that Microsoft makes are what made the computer revolution possible. Those products are what put a computer on every desktop. IBM could not have made a success of the PC, and Mac and Unix systems wouldn't be where they are today without Microsoft. SR