On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 11:12 PM, TheMacintoshLady wrote: >> And which ones, specifically, would those be? > > Why don't you read the docs? Because you made the comment. I thought maybe you could provide examples, since you made the comment. Also, I don't know which docs you're referring to. > >> I'm curious about how FaxSTF's failure to be accepted as a worthy >> replacement for a product like GlobalFax could possibly be due to >> "limitations of the OS." > > There is no GlobalFax for X or I'd be using it. I realize that. GlobalFax is the standard according to many other people. And you missed the point... > >> And how that could possibly explain the fact that people didn't accept >> the Mac OS 9 version of FaxSTF either. > > YOU may not have accepted it but plenty of folks that I work with use > it > just fine. Why should they buy something when a perfectly good > application that works flawlessly for the occasional fax, came with the > machine free? :-) > First of all, I didn't say that I didn't accept it. I don't fax from my computers. That's what fax machines are for. Secondly, I was referring to your comment in the context of what Vincent wrote.