At 12:14 PM -0500 3/27/04, Alex wrote: >A succinct account of the story can be found at ><http://www.ibiblio.org/tkan/software/cddb_wsj_12.31.01.pdf>, and >it's endorsed by Ti Kan, who started it all. What the article >doesn't cover is the fact that a highly significant fraction of the >value of CDDB was due to volunteer contributors. In other words, >those who reaped the profits of the sale of CDDB reaped the profits >of unpaid labour. Thanks for the article. Matter-of-factly, well-written. And I concur with your take on it. I'm sure that I admire the vision and initiative of the originators but I feel certain that the value added by the submitters was significant and "under-rewarded". But then, I suppose one can entertain similar reservations about the business model of efforts like MacFixit, and the purchase of the Deja News Usenet archives, and so on. It seems that we've come to tacitly accept that the aggregator owns the individuals' contributions (and yet avoids responsibility for any downside to that content). Am I ranting yet <g>? -- "It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity." - Albert Einstein