On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:18 AM, Vincent Cayenne wrote: > At 2:20 AM -0500 12/16/05, Charles Martin wrote: >> 95% or better of all the Word and Excel documents people receive >> were created by people who are just barely functional with the >> most basic featureset of those programs. In my experience, greater >> than 95% of the word documents I receive could have been sent as >> plain text with no change of appearance. The same goes for Excel >> Worksheets -- apart from the occasional bit of formatting (like >> bold, italic or some fancy font they have that I don't), nothing >> changes in 95%+ of the worksheets I get -- and I've opened many of >> them in Excel proper just to be sure of this. This is but one of >> the many reasons to hate Microsoft. > > I can think of so much to dislike about Microsoft but can't quite > follow the reasoning you use above. Perhaps there are some unstated > elements in the logic? It seems as though you're saying one should > hate Microsoft because people are "just barely functional with the > most basic featureset" of Word and Excel. By that reasoning, one > would vilify any and every maker of an email client... When people send you plain text in word, send them back a reply in Adobe Illustrator or InDesign. If they complain, say all your friends have it, and use it constantly for email communications because its so convenient - and it runs great on the Mac and PC. But I don't see what that has to do with hating Word or Excel. If someone sent you a plain text message in Maya, would you hate that program too? I'm having to strongly resist the urge to make political analogies . . SR