Heh, Heh, starting a new rumor here. As General Motors struggles to stay ahead of Toyota, they will come out with a new model vehicle and name it "Car." Al Poulin Anger, hate, and revenge are for the devil, forgiveness is for God, proactive self-defense is for the rest of us. On Dec 26, 2005, at 4:53 AM, Vincent Cayenne wrote: > X;{ :-) > > A touch of flu just in time to spoil my Christmas dinner, so I'm > needlessly Scrooging here: > > At 12:22 AM -0500 12/26/05, Charles Martin wrote: >> Everything a Mac does (and says about itself) is there for good >> reason. > > ...except for Apple's raving insanity in naming applications: which > geniuses signed off on the generic "Mail", "Address Book", and > "Pages"? These twits obviously were shuttered in a developer's > paradise with nice little code names and a *need* to ensure that there > were no leaks about the precious projects? 'Cause out in the real > world, trying to use resources like Google to isolate anything > involving those apps, trying to hold a conversation with someone > unfamiliar with the current Mac, trying to explain a > multi-application** technique - these all suffer from those names. > > Several applications have *an* address book, which must be noted as > distinct from *the* Address Book app. A conversation about a problem > goes blooey at the "OK, now open Mail" point when the user launches > their browser and goes to the web mail (or opens mail, in another > client). > > I think when the "i" prefix started being made fun of, Steve decided > "OK, we'll just leave it off and see how you like it!". > > Ah well, I don't suppose I'd have been impressed by the names iMail > and iPages anyway. And iBook was already taken. :-) > > > > ** example "multi-application" technique: emailing a bunch of holiday > photos to a family member. A friend called me up earlier, while > already on a call to their family computer wiz (all-PC) who was trying > to instruct her in sending her batch of photos. Frustrated by > discussion of "compression, zip, properties", she called for more > help. I said "Forget all the tech stuff, make an album with the > photos, use the Share menu and email it. She did so, chose > medium-size, got an OK on the file size from the wiz, was momentarily > disconcerted by the delay as iPhoto did its thing before handing off > to Mail.app, and was then OK and done. But the PC wiz, a good guy who > knows exactly what he's about, couldn't quite get any handle on what > I'd told her to do. Statements like "OK, now just wait for Mail to > open with the message just needing addressing." or "If the address is > already in your Address Book..." carry no audio clues about the > application being used. > > If you don't know, you're waiting for the rest of the info - Outlook? > Eudora? Web client? An Apple-specific app? What're you using? Yes, > yes, I know it's mail, but what is the *name* of the program? > > Those who've been helping end users for any length of time are > accustomed to the users' tendency to impart generic terms. It's not > Internet Explorer or Mozilla FireFox, it's "my Internet". It's not > Outlook Express, it's "my email". When these helpers hear Mac users > say "Mail" and "Address Book", they're already leaping into > clarification mode. > -- > 'tis as said. [Reality is defined by being described] > _______________________________________________ > X-Newbies mailing list > X-Newbies at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x-newbies > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >