On 04 Jun, 2005, at 00:24, Rad Craig wrote: > A friend just sent this to me, thought ti might interest those of > you who haven't heard about it yet: Sigh... the boneyard of the computer industry is littered with companies who thought they could implement multiple operating systems across multiple architectures. From UNIVAC, DEC and Compaq to Sun and HP -- they are now all has- beens. IBM is the only vendor who has managed to stay alive across multiple architectures ... but just barely. One would hope that Jobs would learn from history... Apple has plenty of experience available to it -- I know that many of its Engineers have "been there and done that" -- they came from those has-beens. T.T.F.N. William H. Magill # Beige G3 [Rev A motherboard - 300 MHz 768 Meg] OS X 10.2.8 # Flat-panel iMac (2.1) [800MHz - Super Drive - 768 Meg] OS X 10.3.8 # PWS433a [Alpha 21164 Rev 7.2 (EV56)- 64 Meg] Tru64 5.1a # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-3 (EV6) - 256 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 # XP1000 [Alpha 21264-A (EV 6.7) - 384 meg] FreeBSD 5.3 magill at mcgillsociety.org magill at acm.org magill at mac.com whmagill at gmail.com