On 12/27/07, Richard Hartman <seasoft at west.net> wrote: > - Unmounting the LAN volume and instead using scp or rsync (and the > IP address of the source mac) produced the expected transfer rate of > 100 megabits/sec, which was the speed limit expected by the slowest > network element in the loop (the 100 mbps nic on one of the macs). Someone else had suggested FTP. Would it work similarly well? I don't know much about this, but it would seem to me that scp would be slower if there's encryption going on. rsync would, I assume, be faster than scp, but would rsync and ftp be comparable? Am I off-base? Thanks TjL