What makes the G5 chip so much faster than the G4 if the "bits" aren't so much of a factor? dZ. wrote: > The problem, as I see it, is that most general users have bought into > the marketing campaigns that more is always better, 64bits is twice as > good as 32bits, 1.42MHz is faster than 1.25MHz (by virtue of clock > speed alone), yadda yadda. Increasing memory, bus/memory bandwidth, > clock speed, or word bit-length, each one individually, is only part of > the answer. For overall performance increase a *lot* of other factors > need to be considered,