[X4U] Tiger & 64-Bit Applications...
DZ-Jay
dz at caribe.net
Fri Apr 15 07:23:20 PDT 2005
Richard Gilmore wrote:
> What makes the G5 chip so much faster than the G4 if the "bits" aren't so
> much of a factor?
>
First, I'd like to clarify that I didn't imply that the bits are not
much of a factor. I tried to express that the bits are just as much a
factor as many other elements or features, and that they should be
considered as a whole. My point was that assuming that a G5 or Tiger
upgrade was not worth it, simply because not *all* Tiger apps run as
native 64-bit applications -- i.e. considering the bit-ness only, as it
were -- was wrong. There are still plenty of architechtural
improvements, both in the G5 *and* Tiger.
But, since you ask, what makes the G5 chip faster? well, for on thing
the 1.25GHz frontside bus, the 64-bit optimized execution core, 2
double-precision FPUs. Also, keep in mind that, as explained in other
posts here, the math and core libraries of Tiger have been optimized to
take advantage of the 64-bit technology of the G5. It is expected that
Panther will execute faster on a G5, but Tiger will be even *faster*.
dZ.
More information about the X4U
mailing list